Red Flags and Solutions for STL in Scotland
Our MD, Louise Dickins, attended a meeting with the Minister for Housing, Paul McLennan MSP, together with ASSC CEO Fiona Campbell on 11th July 2023. We were asked to highlight the red flags for our sector and report back. The Minister had our Red Flags and Solutions for STL in Scotland document later that day. The crucial question is, will the Scottish Government finally grasp the nettle and embrace our solutions to avoid a cliff edge catastrophe on 1st October ’23? Time (and there’s not much of that left) will tell……
Here’s our letter to the Minister for Housing, Paul McLennan MSP.
“You have made it clear that you intend that Short-Term Let (STL) Licensing is fully live by 1/10/23 for existing, as well as, new operators. You have acknowledged that there are outstanding issues which need addressing. You asked us to highlight the red flags, the specific details which are causing challenges for the sector.
“We have outlined below, as briefly as we can, 14 red flags which must be addressed in order to achieve your aim of delivering licensing, and to reset relations with the sector whilst supporting rather than damaging tourism.
“Embracing our recommendations will show that you are listening to the industry; that you understand and are in touch with the needs of people across Scotland who want to do the right thing, to be socially responsible and provide safe accommodation for visitors to Scotland now and in the future. Scotland’s self-catering needs to be open for business after 1/10/23.
“The Scottish Government has one remaining pathway towards a more equitable, fair and effective STL regulatory landscape. The Scottish Government must lay an SSI to amend the 1982 Act, and re-draft the guidance associated with Licensing Order 2022, in collaboration with industry and local government stakeholders.
Red Flags and Solutions for STL in Scotland
Schedule 3.13 of the Licensing Order must be amended to provide clarity that planning is only sought where a material change of use has occurred, unless in a Planning Control Area, at which point policy 26B comes into effect, but this is not applied retrospectively. Indeed, planning consideration should be removed entirely from the Order. Planning is already covered in existing Planning regulations, including those pertaining to Planning Control Areas. This will remove the current uncertainty as a first hurdle, which is putting people off even considering applying for a licence. Further if the Housing Minister cannot discuss planning, then surely it stands to reason that he cannot discuss housing, because housing and the use of a property is a planning consideration.
Licensing concerns the safety of the activity, not the use of the property. If the intention of the policy is not to ‘manage down’ the number of STLs as you reassured us this morning, this needs to be made clear publicly. This would assist you to regain the trust of the sector and alter the public perception that STL licensing is going to solve the housing crisis. Only neighbour complaints which are evidenced and demonstrable should be taken into account (as per HMO’s).
Once mandatory conditions have been met, there should be a presumption to grant licences, and renewals as per HMO Licensing. This will give confidence to the sector that if they are abiding by H&S legislation, they will be granted licences to trade and give confidence to guests to book in advance.
Local authorities must have reviewed and published lawful policies based on the outcome of the Judicial Review by 30/7/23, based on your intent to have the scheme live on 1/10/23 for existing operators. Ultra vires policies must be removed (boat & bike hire, carpet, guests out of hot tubs at a certain time etc). The Order must be amended via an SSI to ensure that the legislation is absolutely clear and not open to interpretation. Officials this morning commented that amendments to guidance had been constrained by the need to reflect the legislation itself, so to afford meaningful change, the legislation itself must be amended. Scottish Government guidance must also be clear, unambiguous and not open to interpretation. Applicants and licensing staff in local authorities must have clarity in good time, in order to be confident in making and processing applications.
Provisional Licences should be provided by licensing authorities as per the Scotland 2005 Act. This is to allow the smooth transition for the purchase of a trading business. Provisional licences should be in place until the renewal date, as per MOTs. This requires an amendment to the legislation via an SSI.
For new builds and renovations (cottage / house / cabin / glamping etc), a Provisional Licence should be issued until the required certification is available, understanding that it will be compliant with building standards regulations. This would enable an owner to start trading and take bookings and avoid completely unnecessary delays.
Temporary Licences should be provided in all licensing authority areas as a mandatory requirement. This will facilitate events such as The Open golf etc.
Homeletting / Home sharing: As long as mandatory conditions are met, people should be encouraged and supported to rent out their home whenever they need to, without barriers, to give people the ability to, for example, help themselves in a financial crisis. This will support social responsibility and we believe will alleviate some housing pressure. Planning consideration should be removed for home sharing / home letting whether in a Planning Control Area or not. This removes the uncertainty created by local authorities and their interpretations of change of use.
Second Home owners: Second home owners who are currently secondary letting and economically contributing, cannot pivot towards PRTs because they need to gain access throughout the year for their own use. Therefore, as long as mandatory conditions are met, owners should be encouraged and supported to rent out their second home whenever they need or want to, without barriers. This will support social responsibility, local communities and economies and we believe will alleviate some housing pressure when used as mid-term rentals. Planning consideration for second homes should be removed, whether in a Planning Control Area or not, as there is no material change of use. This removes the uncertainty created by local authorities and their interpretations of change of use. We believe it will prevent homes which are currently economically contributing, being closed for the majority of the year.
Registered landlords of properties which are normally let on a long-term basis using PRT legislation should be granted Temporary Licences / Exemptions for up to six weeks. The process should be fast, seamless, and low cost, given that they are already compliant with the H&S regime. As long as point 7 and 8 are met, the only type of property requiring a Temporary Licence or Exemption would be properties that are already rented via PRTs. This will ensure that there is the required elasticity to, for example, provide sufficient accommodation for the Edinburgh Festivals.
Temporary accommodation/mid-term rentals: Mid-term rentals are needed throughout Scotland to house people and workers temporarily. There needs to be a distinction that holiday lets and mid-term rentals are not the same thing. There would be clarity if the definition of a short term let is amended to lets of up to 28 days. Temporary accommodation of this nature should be considered within a separate regulatory framework.
Fees should sit within the estimates provided by the Scottish Government’s BRIA and a set fee would be a means to achieve this. The costs in some LA’s is disincentivising some owners from applying.
Clarity around the enforcement framework from 1/10/23 is crucial. As we said, our ASSC members want to do the right thing, but there are other bad operators who do not. The lack of data underpinning this legislation is a gift to bad operators as enforcers do not know who they are, what they are or where they are. This undermines the competence of the legislation and carries the potential of significant reputational damage.
Make a public statement of intent to make meaningful changes to ameliorate the scheme and support Scottish businesses and private individuals.
“We sincerely hope that all 14 solutions outlined in this document will be actively adopted by the Scottish Government, so that we can arrive at a proportionate and fair regulatory regime, where unintended consequences have been largely addressed and the small accommodation sector can survive, thriving into a positive future.
“We would be grateful to understand how this has landed with you at your earliest convenience. The pressure on me to provide clarity for my members is becoming more overwhelming with each day that passes.”
11th July 2023
Fiona Campbell, Chief Executive ASSC
Louise Dickins, Director ASSC, Managing Director Dickins Edinburgh Ltd
So, will the Minister for Housing acknowledge these red flags and embrace the solutions we have suggested for STL in Scotland in time to avoid a catastrophe after the 1st October ’23. You would have thought that that would be the pragmatic and sensible approach. The clock is most definitely ticking Mr McLennan. There is so much at stake and such a vast amount to lose if you don’t get this legislation right.
Oh, and if you own self catering in Scotland and aren’t a member of the ASSC, put that right, by signing up to become a member today. If we manage to save self catering, it will be down to them and their indefatigable CEO, Fiona Campbell.
Thank you for reading our blog. Please share to get the word out there and comment too.
Alex
September 8, 2023 at 9:04 pm
It’s an absolute joke! I have worked my ass off for 23yrs to be able to afford my flat and invest in purchasing another as I’ve always been told invest in brick and mortar, I’ve rented out long term before and always complied with all H&S mandatory requirements but now if I do STL I need change of planning??! For what reason? It’s still the same flat, with same amount of people renting just on a different time scale. In fact it can be argued a STL flat is kept in a much safer condition as we have regular entry to it compared to Long term rentals.
Reply
Dickins
October 5, 2023 at 5:49 pm
We’re hearing you Alex. Feels like there is the potential for A1P1 Humans Rights Act claims.
Michael Gallagher
September 6, 2023 at 11:25 am
If the intention behind ‘regulation’ is to ensure safety of tenants and their neighbours, presumably these have to be enforced through a system of regular inspections. Does the Bill provide for the creation of a professional inspectorate? If not, the new rules should rightly be called guidelines, not regulations. And the license fees should rightly be called money gouging, not a payment towards the cost of an actual public service.
Reply
David Craig
August 23, 2023 at 6:24 pm
I have a “Granny flat” which has been passed by Fire Dpt,Electrical standards and all other authorities concerned (cost a fortune) but West Dunbartonshire Council now class it as commercial property even although it is within my own home and want full fire retardent walls,ceilings etc capable of withstanding fire for 1 hour. This would mean re lining all internal wall and ceilings and possibly as it is now commercial a sprinkler system installed. It is their policy that all stl including B@Bs will be classed as commercial and will require anywhere the non family members are allowed to be fire treated.This is ironic as we will now be closing the property cancelling bookings for next year etc. and we have just won an award from a booking agency as having one of the best feedback scores in Britain.BURAUCRACY GONE MAD. There will be very little holiday accomodation left around Loch Lomond with this idiotic decision and complete lack of common sense. OH I suppose we are dealing with the Council after all.
Reply
Dickins
October 5, 2023 at 5:51 pm
That’s an absolutely crazy story. Of course if you were to put it to long let, none of the fire safety requirements you’ve been asked for would be required……
P Smith
July 23, 2023 at 12:38 pm
I am aware of cases where STL operators have applied for retrospective planning and despite meeting all the published criteria (no shared entrance, no history of complaints or antisocial behaviour, adding economic value etc) planning has been refused due to the opinion of the planners that the property adds more value as a residential property (even though it has not been used as a full time residence for decades). How can this be squared with Paul McLennans assurances that they are not trying to manage down the number of STLs?
Reply
Dickins
July 26, 2023 at 4:09 pm
It can’t. The Scottish Government was absolutely capable of creating this mess, but they are absolutely incapable of sorting it out!
Emma Tautscher
July 18, 2023 at 9:27 am
More & more B&Bs are closing here in the Highlands due to uncertainty and the sheer volume of paperwork required. Surely home-sharing should be totally exempt from this onerous, expensive and daunting procedure!
Reply
Dickins
July 19, 2023 at 1:34 pm
It’s a bureaucratic overkill for sure. We understand that homes need to be safe, but when you need a planning consultant to help you submit a home letting license, the world has gone mad and the consequences will be far reaching.